Detailed intake starts from zero
Contact details arrive. Staff still gathers the answers, documents, and context needed to assess the matter.
For firms replying to our outreach
We map one case type, build the lead and document workflows, connect the handoffs, and help your team run intake from first contact to attorney review.
The intake gap
If staff still has to chase every document, type every fact, check every page, and ask who owns the next step, the form did not solve intake. It only announced that work had arrived.
Contact details arrive. Staff still gathers the answers, documents, and context needed to assess the matter.
Names, dates, amounts, clauses, and signatures must be read, typed, and checked before a reviewer can use them.
An incomplete agreement or unanswered question survives until a paralegal or lawyer opens the file.
The matter stalls between intake staff, paralegals, and attorneys because the handoff is not explicit.
How we help
This is not a generic form builder. We map the questions, records, facts, exceptions, roles, and decisions for one case type your firm already knows.
We work with your intake staff, paralegals, and attorneys to document acceptance criteria, required records, common gaps, and review gates.
We configure the short lead form, detailed questions, document requests, reminders, parsing rules, and source-linked facts.
We assign each phase, route work into clear inboxes, preserve the human callback, and prepare the handoff to your case-management process.
We test representative matters, train the assigned roles, review exceptions, and refine the workflow around what happens in real intake.
What changes
The phone call still matters. It is where your team listens, reassures, and builds trust. The system should handle the questions, documents, case facts, gaps, and handoffs around that relationship.
Short first contact, detailed intake when ready, straightforward uploads, and follow-up through the communication channel they use.
Open the answers, proposed facts, source documents, missing items, and assigned task without rebuilding the file.
See the facts, evidence, conflicts, and gaps, then accept, decline, or send the matter back with a specific request.
Published Bennett Legal comparison
$87,000Filevine, Moxo, and data-extraction pipelines combined each year. Staff and lawyer time were separate.
Bennett Legal had a form, software, and extraction tools. Accepted intake information still had to be entered again before case work could continue.
Read the Bennett Legal case study →Results depend on records, workflow, integrations, configuration, and firm review. OBE does not promise savings, speed, completeness, capacity, or legal outcomes.
Common questions
No. OBE can prepare and carry the intake record into your existing process. The exact handoff depends on your systems and integrations.
No. We begin with one familiar, repeatable case type. That gives your team a contained workflow to map, test, and improve.
No. The first call is where a person listens, reassures the claimant, and builds trust. OBE handles the repeatable data work around that conversation.
Your firm controls acceptance and engagement. Lawyers remain responsible for legal judgment, analysis, strategy, and client advice.
OBE can prepare structured, source-linked proposals from intake answers and records. Authorized people review the work, resolve uncertainty, and control consequential actions.
Your first case-mapping call
We will trace how the lead enters, where documents go, which facts staff retypes, how gaps are chased, and who owns every phase.
Map your first case type